Jews called in Christ: Apartheid wall in Palestine

Showing posts with label Apartheid wall in Palestine. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless | Jews for Justice for Palestinians

The true God who is the eternal I AM prophesied through His servants the prophets of the coming of the Messiah, who is the only Saviour of the world. The form of salvation, His Cross, is shown by Isaiah 52- 53, see here: Jews called in Christ: St. Isaiah and the time of His appearing and His sacrifice on His Most Holy Cross for our salvation is told in Daniel 9 in St. Daniel’s 70 weeks of years prophecy.

For all Jews wishing to convert sincerely from the heart to Jesus Christ now, here is a prayer based on the biblical Hebrew of the prophets of the Old Testament and the Septuagint Greek of the Old Testament and the New Testament and Arabic.

(The Arabic, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, means the same as God Almighty, or 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator, in Septuagint Greek.)

In the below “Dam (Blood) Kadosh (Holy) bet Yeshua ha Maschiach (Jesus Christ) kanawn anawim (have mercy on Your faithful [those who turn to God by the shed Blood of Christ on Calvary])” is asking for God's forgiveness by the shed Holy Blood of Christ – which is the only forgiveness there is from God for sin.

Shalom Aleichem bet Baruch Adonai Yahweh Eloheiunu Yahweh echad dérekh ben Yahweh bar Elohim Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach b'tókh Ruach Elohim Yahweh Adonai

Adonai Yahweh El Olam kanawn anawim

Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim

Adonai Ruach Elohim Yahweh kanawn anawim

Adonai Yahweh Eloheiunu Yahweh echad kanawn anawim

Adonai Yahweh Elohim Kadosh kanawn anawim

Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim

Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim

'Agious 'Agious 'Agious Kurios 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator Elieson

Kyrie Elieson

Christie Elieson

Kyrie Elieson

'Agious 'Agious 'Agious Kurios 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, Elieson

Baruch Adonai Yahweh Eloheuinu Yahweh echad Elohiko Hashamaim

Most blessed Lord Yahweh God-plural personhood Yahweh composite-Unity God higher than the highest heaven

Shamaim Hashamaim Eloueth Ahiyah asher Ahiyah

higher than the highest heaven God I am (Yah) that I am (Yah)

El Olam Yahweh El Elyown Yahweh Elohim eth Yaoth Elohim Qadosh
God eternal Yahweh Most High Yahweh God you Yah who drives the evil powers to flight Holy God

Eloah Israel El Shaddai

God of Israel God Almighty

Moshawah

Our Saviour

Adonai Eloah Melek Eloah miqqadash

Lord God King God our Sanctifier

El Israel Anawim

God of Israel Your faithful

El Elohim Yahweh El Olam eth Abba Our Father of Lights Holy with

God of Gods (most high) Yahweh God eternal you

Whom there is no variation or shadow of turning

ben Yahweh bar Elohim

Son of Yahweh Son of God

Yahweh Shamah Emmanuel Yeshua ha Maschiach Jesus Christ Our only Lord

Yahweh Christ perfect servant of hearing God God with us Jesus the Messiah

and Saviour

Ruach Yahweh Chokmah Abiyr Gebuwrah Neshamah Yahweh

Spirit of Yahweh Wisdom Might Power Spirit-Breath of Yahweh

Holy Spirit Life Quickening Breath of Life Energy our

Paraclete

Ruach Elohim Olam Yahweh Borea Emeth Huy Eloah Chay Melek Olam Eloah

Spirit of God eternal Yahweh Creator True Living God and King Immortal God of Hosts

Sabaoth Holy Trinity Adorable Unity

Eloah Anawim with and

God of the faithful

by the prayer and company of all Your

Elect Doxas and Anawim for and with us unceasingly kanawn Anawim

have mercy on Your faithful

Our Only

KANNAW

Our Only
Holy Lord God Who Created and Redeemed us
TSIDKENOU

Our Only Righteousness

YIREH

Our Only Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world

NISSI

Our Only Sacrifice

MELCHISEDECH

Our Only Priest King

MELEK

Our Only Sovereign King of kings and Lord of lords

SHALOM

Our Only Peace from above

KOHANE

Our Only High Priest

ROHI

Our Only Good Shepherd and Overseer of our souls

ROPHE

Our Only Healer and Miracle Worker

MIQQADOSH

Our Only Sanctifier

HOLY HOLY HOLY LORD GOD PANTOCRATOR

Who is and was and is to come

Unceasingly

to Whom be all the

LOVE

ADORATION

AUTHORITY

GLORY

HONOR

OBEDIENCE

THANKSGIVING

POWER

DIVINITY

RICHES

WISDOM

STRENGTH

BLESSING

DOMINION

SALVATION

PRAISE

WORSHIP

SERVICE

DEEDS

INNOCENCE

FAITH

PREACHINGS

PROPHECIES

PRAYERS

EXALTATION

THANKSGIVING

WE LOVE YOU FOR YOU FIRST LOVED US

WITH ALL THANKSGIVING

With and by the prayer and company of all Your elect angels and saints, for and with us unceasingly,

especially Your holy

SERAFIM

CHERUBIM

KURIOTETES

ARCHES

especially

St. Michael

St. Gabriel holy Archangelos

EXOUSIAS

DUNAMEIS

ANGELOS

Grant us Your gifts and mercies, especially Your Holy

CHOKMAH WISDOM FIRE OF LOVE OF WISDOM YOURSELF HOLY LIFE

BIYNAH UNDERSTANDING WISDOM OF SUPERNATURAL KNOWLEDGE PROPHECY AND MIRACLES

ETSAH COUNSEL MIGHT OF SANCTIFYING LOVE IN FAITH

GEBUWRAH POWER STRENGTH HEALINGS MIRACLES

DAATH KNOWLEDGE TO KNOW ONLY THE GOOD DISCERNMENT OF SPIRITS AUTHORITY AND STRENGTH REPELLING ALL EVIL SPIRITS INVISIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM US UNCEASINGLY

YIRAH GODLINESS ENERGY OF MIRACLES IN THE UNITY OF GOD TONGUES AND TRANSLATION

AHABAH AGAPE PHILADELPHIA LOVE SPIRIT OF THE GOSPEL THE LOVE OF GOD JESUS CHRIST OUR ONLY LORD AND SAVIOUR

See this: Palestine Cry

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless | Jews for Justice for Palestinians

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless

Photo by S’ra DeSantis, from Vermonters for a Just Peace
European campaign against Israel’s apartheid wall launched in the Hague

#10Years2Long

By Palestine Information Centre
July 02, 2012

THE HAGUE– The Hague-based European initiative against the wall and settlements launched on Sunday an information campaign against Israel’s segregation wall and settlement expansion in the West Bank.

“No to the wall … no to settlements” is the slogan for its campaign that includes sit-ins, protests, symposiums and social networking.

Head of the European initiative Amin Abu Rashed said in a press release that the campaign was launched on the eighth anniversary of the resolution against the segregation wall that was issued by the international court of justice in 2004.

Abu Rashid added that the campaign is aimed at renewing international moves to condemn Israel’s settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian lands.

He noted that the campaign started on Sunday and would end on July 9, the same day the international court of justice issued its resolution against the wall.

The anti-wall activist affirmed that the campaign would include meetings with officials from international legal and humanitarian organizations and the UN to hand them a research study about the adverse impacts of the wall on the lives of Palestinians in the occupied territories during the past eight years.

A number of symposiums about the Israeli apartheid wall and settlement activities will be organized in a number of Arab and foreign countries, he added.

He stressed that the European initiative would be working keenly during its campaign on delivering a message to the international court of justice emphasizing the need for forming an executive body able to enforce its resolution against the wall.

The European initiative against the wall and settlements is headquartered in the Hague, Netherlands, and was established on the first of June 2010. It is a consortium of many European groups and human rights organizations which oppose Israel’s apartheid wall and settlement activities in the Palestinian lands.

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

ADVISORY OPINION

The Court finds that the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and its associated régime are contrary to international law; it states the legal consequences arising from that illegality

International Court of Justice, Press Release
July 9, 2004

THE HAGUE, 9 July 2004. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has today rendered its Advisory Opinion in the case concerning the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (request for advisory opinion).

In its Opinion, the Court finds unanimously that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by the United Nations General Assembly and decides by fourteen votes to one to comply with that request.

The Court responds to the question as follows:
- “A. By fourteen votes to one,
The construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated régime, are contrary to international law”;

- “B. By fourteen votes to one,
Israel is under an obligation to terminate its breaches of international law; it is under an obligation to cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, to dismantle forthwith the structure therein situated, and to repeal or render ineffective forthwith all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, in accordance with paragraph 151 of this Opinion”;

- “C. By fourteen votes to one,
Israel is under an obligation to make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem”;

- “D. By thirteen votes to two,
All States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction; all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 have in addition the obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention”;

- “E. By fourteen votes to one,
The United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and the associated régime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.”
Reasoning of the Court

The Advisory Opinion is divided into three parts: jurisdiction and judicial propriety; legality of the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; legal consequences of the breaches found.

Jurisdiction of the Court and judicial propriety
The Court states that when it is seised of a request for an advisory opinion, it must first consider whether it has jurisdiction to give that opinion. It finds that the General Assembly, which requested the opinion by resolution ES‑10/14 of 8 December 2003, is authorized to do so by Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter.

The Court, as it has sometimes done in the past, then gives certain indications as to the relationship between the question on which the advisory opinion is requested and the activities of the General Assembly. It finds that the General Assembly, in requesting an advisory opinion from the Court, did not exceed its competence, as qualified by Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Charter, which provides that, while the Security Council is exercising its functions in respect of any dispute or situation, the Assembly must not make any recommendation with regard thereto unless the Security Council so requests.

The Court further refers to the fact that the General Assembly adopted resolution ES‑10/14 during its Tenth Emergency Special Session, convened pursuant to resolution 377A (V), which provides that if the Security Council fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, the General Assembly may consider the matter immediately with a view to making recommendations to Member States. The Court finds that the conditions laid down by that resolution were met when the Tenth Emergency Special Session was convened; that was in particular true when the General Assembly decided to request an opinion, as the Security Council was at that time unable to adopt a resolution concerning the construction of the wall as a result of the negative vote of a permanent member.

The Court then rejects the argument that an opinion could not be given in the present case on the ground that the question posed in the request is not a legal one.

Having established its jurisdiction, the Court considers the propriety of giving the requested opinion. It recalls that the lack of consent by a State to its contentious jurisdiction has no bearing on its jurisdiction to give an advisory opinion. It adds that the giving of an opinion would not have the effect, in the present case, of circumventing the principle of consent to judicial settlement, given that the question on which the General Assembly requested an opinion is located in a much broader frame of reference than that of the bilateral dispute between Israel and Palestine, and that it is of direct concern to the United Nations. Nor does the Court accept the contention that it should decline to give the advisory opinion requested because its opinion could impede a political, negotiated solution to the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict. It further finds it has before it sufficient information and evidence to enable it to give its opinion, and emphasizes that it is for the General Assembly to assess the usefulness of that opinion. The Court concludes from the foregoing that there is no compelling reason precluding it from giving the requested opinion.

Legality of the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Before addressing the legal consequences of the construction of the wall (the term which the General Assembly has chosen to use and which is also used in the Opinion, since the other expressions sometimes employed are no more accurate if understood in the physical sense), the Court considers whether or not the construction of the wall is contrary to international law.

The Court determines the rules and principles of international law which are relevant to the question posed by the General Assembly. The Court begins by citing, with reference to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and to General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV), the principles of the prohibition of the threat or use of force and the illegality of any territorial acquisition by such means, as reflected in customary international law. It further cites the principle of self‑determination of peoples, as enshrined in the Charter and reaffirmed by resolution 2625 (XXV). As regards international humanitarian law, the Court refers to the provisions of the Hague Regulation of 1907, which have become part of customary law, as well as the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949, applicable in those Palestinian territories which before the armed conflict of 1967 lay to the east of the 1949 Armistice demarcation line (or “Green Line”) and were occupied by Israel during that conflict. The Court further notes that certain human rights instruments (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child) are applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The Court ascertains whether the construction of the wall has violated the above‑mentioned rules and principles. It first observes that the route of the wall as fixed by the Israeli Government includes within the “Closed Area” (between the wall and the “Green Line”) some 80 percent of the settlers living in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Recalling that the Security Council described Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in that territory as a “flagrant violation” of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the Court finds that those settlements have been established in breach of international law. It further considers certain fears expressed to it that the route of the wall will prejudge the future frontier between Israel and Palestine; it considers that the construction of the wall and its associated régime “create a ‘fait accompli’ on the ground that could well become permanent, in which case, . . . [the construction of the wall] would be tantamount to de facto annexation”. The Court notes that the route chosen for the wall gives expression in loco to the illegal measures taken by Israel, and deplored by the Security Council, with regard to Jerusalem and the settlements, and that it entails further alterations to the demographic composition of the Occupied Palestinian Territory. It finds that the “construction [of the wall], along with measures taken previously, . . . severely impedes the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self‑determination, and is therefore a breach of Israel’s obligation to respect that right”.

The Court then considers the information furnished to it regarding the impact of the construction of the wall on the daily life of the inhabitants of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (destruction or requisition of private property, restrictions on freedom of movement, confiscation of agricultural land, cutting‑off of access to primary water sources, etc.). It finds that the construction of the wall and its associated régime are contrary to the relevant provisions of the Hague Regulations of 1907 and of the Fourth Geneva Convention; that they impede the liberty of movement of the inhabitants of the territory as guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; and that they also impede the exercise by the persons concerned of the right to work, to health, to education and to an adequate standard of living as proclaimed in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Lastly, the Court finds that this construction and its associated régime, coupled with the establishment of settlements, are tending to alter the demographic composition of the Occupied Palestinian Territory and thereby contravene the Fourth Geneva Convention and the relevant Security Council resolutions.

The Court observes that certain humanitarian law and human rights instruments include qualifying clauses or provisions for derogation which may be invoked by States parties, inter alia where military exigencies or the needs of national security or public order so require. It states that it is not convinced that the specific course Israel has chosen for the wall was necessary to attain its security objectives and, holding that none of such clauses are applicable, finds that the construction of the wall constitutes “breaches by Israel of various of its obligations under the applicable international humanitarian law and human rights instruments”.

In conclusion, the Court considers that Israel cannot rely on a right of self‑defence or on a state of necessity in order to preclude the wrongfulness of the construction of the wall. The Court accordingly finds that the construction of the wall and its associated régime are contrary to international law.

Legal consequences of the violations found
The Court draws a distinction between the legal consequences of these violations for Israel and those for other States.

In regard to the former, the Court finds that Israel must respect the right of the Palestinian people to self‑determination and its obligations under humanitarian law and human rights law. Israel must also put an end to the violation of its international obligations flowing from the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and must accordingly cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall, dismantle forthwith those parts of that structure situated within the Occupied Palestinian Territory and forthwith repeal or render ineffective all legislative and regulatory acts adopted with a view to construction of the wall and establishment of its associated régime, except in so far as such acts may continue to be relevant for compliance by Israel with its obligations in regard to reparation. Israel must further make reparation for all damage suffered by all natural or legal persons affected by the wall’s construction.

As regards the legal consequences for other States, the Court finds that all States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction. The Court further finds that it is for all States, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to see to it that any impediment, resulting from the construction of the wall, in the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self‑determination is brought to an end. In addition, all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention are under an obligation, while respecting the Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention.

Finally, the Court is of the view that the United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and its associated régime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.

The Court concludes by stating that the construction of the wall must be placed in a more general context. In this regard, the Court notes that Israel and Palestine are “under an obligation scrupulously to observe the rules of international humanitarian law”. In the Court’s view, the tragic situation in the region can be brought to an end only through implementation in good faith of all relevant Security Council resolutions. The Court further draws the attention of the General Assembly to the “need for . . . efforts to be encouraged with a view to achieving as soon as possible, on the basis of international law, a negotiated solution to the outstanding problems and the establishment of a Palestinian State, existing side by side with Israel and its other neighbours, with peace and security for all in the region”.
Composition of the Court

The Court was composed as follows: Judge Shi, President; Judge Ranjeva, Vice‑President; Judges Guillaume, Koroma, Vereshchetin, Higgins, Parra‑Aranguren, Kooijmans, Rezek, Al‑Khasawneh, Buergenthal, Elaraby, Owada, Simma and Tomka; Registrar Couvreur.

Judges Koroma, Higgins, Kooijmans and Al‑Khasawneh append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion. Judge Buergenthal appends a declaration. Judges Elaraby and Owada append separate opinions.
__________
A summary of the Advisory Opinion is published in the document entitled “Summary No. 2004/2”, to which summaries of the declaration and separate opinions appended to the Advisory Opinion are attached. This Press Communiqué, the summary of the Advisory Opinion and the latter’s full text can also be accessed on the Court’s website by clicking on “Docket” and “Decisions” (www.icj-cij.org).

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Alfred M. Lilienthal

Maps of Israel, Palestine, the Wall, and Settlements « Pamela J. Olson

From the below:

"He continues today, after over a half century of effort, to defend the Palestinian people and to call repeatedly for an independent State of Palestine."

Obviously the Apartheid wall in Palestine was not anything that Dr. Lilienthal had in mind. It is a genocidal unlawful monstrosity of Satanic oppression of innocent people and must be destroyed. The only way for justice to exist for the Palestinians is full right of return for all Palestinians and full reparations for all Palestinians and a complete end to all the oppression of the Diabolic JudenZioNazi occupiers of Palestine

Alfred Lilienthal

Home Page

and

First Started: April 14, 2002 -- Last Updated: June 8, 2003

THIS WEBSITE IS DEDICATED

To Christians, Jews, Muslims and Non-Believers, living and dead, who have had not only the courage to place their concern for mankind above their allegiance to any group or sect but also the willingness to do battle in behalf of this conviction. Alfred M. Lilienthal

Alfred M. Lilienthal -- Palestinian Children

Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal: historian, journalist, and lecturer.

Lilienthal was born in 1913 in New York City. He is a graduate of Cornell University and Columbia Law School. As an American of Jewish faith, he first became interested in the Middle East while in the U.S. military and stationed in Egypt during World War II. He later served with the Department of State and as a consultant to the American delegation at the organizing meeting of the United Nations in San Francisco. In 1949, his article, "Israel's Flag Is Not Mine,"published in the Reader's Digest, caused great controversy because of its anti-Zionist position.

Despite condemnation from many influential quarters, Lilienthal has remained in the forefront of the struggle for a balanced U.S. policy not dictated by favoritism toward Israel. He traveled over 25 times to the Middle East for firsthand investigation of events and authored several books including The Zionist Connection that was described by Foreign Affairs journal as "his culminating masterwork." He continues today, after over a half century of effort, to defend the Palestinian people and to call repeatedly for an independent State of Palestine.

Author of :

What Price Israel?

Online Selections From
What Price Israel?
50th Anniversary Edition 1953 -- 2003
With New Introduction and Appendix
Will Be Released Soon

There Goes The Middle East

The Other Side of the Coin

The Zionist Connection I & II

Book Review of The Zionist Connection II
Washington Report On Middle East Affairs
By Grace Halsell -- November 14, 1983

Online Selections From
Zionist Connection II
Introduction and four complete chapters
from the book can be read here.

Lilienthal Historical Photo Album
Middle East -- 1950s to 2003
Nasser, King Hussein, Mubarak, Arafat,
King Saud, Adlai Stevenson,
Peace Accords at White House 1993,
Palestinian Ship of Return 1988,
Christian Mayor of Bethlehem
Elias Freij and author Donald Neff 1984,
Israeli Peace Activist
Jeff Halper 2002,
"Jews for Peace in Palestine and Israel"
Founder Joshua Ruebner 2002

Eyewitness photos of Intifada 1988
More to be added soon.

Greater Israel -- What Does It Really Mean? -- War On Iraq... and Syria... and Iran... and Saudi Arabia... and..... the Palestinians

Greater Israel -- What Does It Really Mean?
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/greaterisrael.htm

Why do many Arabs and Muslims suspect
America's war on Iraq was for Israel?

President George W. Bush's war speech
February 26, 2003
at the American Enterprise Institute
(Ideological home of Zionist-Sharonist
promoters such as Richard Perle)
Who in the U.S. is behind the war on Iraq?

Transcript of Bush's speech, plus links with details on the specific 20 war-mongering members of the American Enterprise Institute in the Bush administration. Also read a related recent article on what our government and media have not been telling us about the real reasons behind our conflict with Arabs and other Muslims. Here are details from the point of view of their concerns about Zionist influence on American foreign policy in the Middle East for over a half century:

The Real Reason They Hate Us

http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/bushataei.htm

A specific word or phrase may be entered here for
results on any of our Mideast related web pages.
For outline of all links, click on gray Site Map button.

Search this site powered by FreeFind

[this link doesn't work here see original site, link in title]

EXAMPLES: Zionism, terror, Palestine, Arafat, peace,
Oslo, United Nations, anti-Semitism, Henry Kissinger,
Sharon, PLO, Jimmy Carter, Holocaust, Arabs, Truman,
Balfour Declaration, Roosevelt, Weizmann, Marshall,
Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Perle, Wolfowitz, Sharansky,
American Enterprise Institute

Read Articles by Dr. Lilienthal Now

Why The Rise In Anti-Semitism In Europe?
October 27, 2002
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/whytherise.htm

Showdown Between Sharon and Arafat
September 23, 2002
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/showdown.htm

An Open Letter To Arafat
July 4, 2002
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/toarafat2002.htm

Swans Commentary:
What Price Middle East Peace?
Article from 1992 reissued in 2002!

[Ed. Note: This is an address given by Dr. Lilienthal, an ardent advocate of a two-state solution, Israel and Palestine, on April 23, 1992 at the University Club, in Washington, D.C. -- that is just about 10 years ago. What's fascinating about his lecture is its relevance in 2002. It could be given today; only the figures would change. More settlements, more killings and destruction, more "revenge" and "retaliation," etc.; but the story and its narrative, even the actors, are frozen in time. Read this address. There is no better reminder and clearer explanation of what can only be defined as a path into self-oblivion. And yet, we all know it could be different...if reason prevailed.] Gilles d’Aymery at Swans

http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/whatpriceme.htm

Older Articles -- 1949-1999

Israel's Flag Is Not Mine
Reader's Digest -- 1949

The State of Israel and the State of the Jew
We are co-religionists and not co-nationalists
Vital Speeches of the Day -- 1950

Zionism & American Jews -- 1981

Semite and Anti-Semite:
A Confusion Stifling American Freedom -- 1986

Witness to History:
New York 1947, Tunis 1988
Palestinian Declaration of Independence

An Open Letter to Yasser Arafat -- 1988

The US Media and the PLO:
Will Things Ever Change? -- 1989

Book on Times' Editor Helps Explain
Media Bias for Israel -- 1989

Boschwitz's Play for the "Jewish Vote"
Costs Him His Senate Seat -- 1991

Shielding Israel From Sanctions Recalls
Failed Policies of Past -- 1993

The Changing Role of B'nai B'rith's
Anti-Defamation League -- 1993

After Oslo and Before Gaza-Jericho:
A Time for Unity Despite Adversity -- 1994

Dr. Alfred Lilienthal's 80th Birthday:
Reflections on a Life-Long Struggle
for Justice in the Middle East -- 1994

The King (Saud of Saudi Arabia) and I:
Eyewitness to History -- 1995

J. William Fulbright: A Giant Passes -- 1995

The United Nations: San Francisco
in 1945 and Fifty Years Later -- 1995

Whether It’s Jerusalem or Nantucket,
You Can’t Go Home Again -- 1997

What Price Holocaustomania?
The Specter of Hitler That Drives Washington’s
"Israel First" Mideast Policy -- 1998

The Truth at Last About Pope Pius
and The Holocaust -- 1998

Recollections of a Young American GI
in Egypt: A Long-Standing Love Affair
With the Middle East -- 1999

The Kennedys and I: JFK’s Bold Words
on the Middle East Conflict -- 1999

Remembering General George Marshall’s
Clash With Clark Clifford Over
Premature Recognition of Israel -- 1999

MORE UNDER CONSTRUCTION HERE SOON

Join Our E-List:
Get announcements of additions at this website,
news articles about Mideast we consider informative,
quick notice of new articles by Alfred Lilienthal
or releases of new books or new editions.

This is a webmaster "Send Only" list.
Identity of members is not made public.

NOTE to Reseachers:
Detailed listings online of the following--

Descriptive Summary
Title:
Alfred M. Lilienthal Papers, 1936-1997
Creator:
Lilienthal, Alfred M.
Extent:
Number of containers: 167 ms. boxes, 2 cu. ft. boxes,
9 oversize boxes, 1 card file box, 189 envelopes,
2 motion picture film reels
Repository:
Hoover Institution Archives
Stanford, California 94305-6010
Abstract:
Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, memoranda,
press releases, serial issues, conference papers, interviews,
studies, clippings, other printed matter, photographs,
and sound recordings, relating to the Middle East,
Arab-Israeli relations, and American foreign policy in the region.
Collection also available on microfilm (154 reels).

http://findaid.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf9k40070k
Click on various categories under Container List
for specifics of photos and correspondence with many
Arab/Jewish/American leaders of the time.

Check back in June-September 2003 for the
development of our Research Center here at this
site with hundreds of rare documents and unique
photos from the Lilienthal Collection.

NOTE: Other material on websites reached through these specific links
below may contain some viewpoints that are not shared by Dr. Lilienthal.

Current Events Links -- 2003

Historical Background

Viewpoints & Discussions

Recommended Resources

New Article by Daughter of King Saud
"King Saud and the Issue of Palestine"
Read at Historical Background link above.

Middle East Peace Dove

Background Music for this page:
The Impossible Dream
from "Man of La Mancha"

Former Congressman Paul Findley has written in
THEY DARE TO SPEAK OUT:
People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby

For all his longstanding and vigorous endeavors for the peaceful reconciliation of Jews and Arabs, Lilienthal remains a lonely figure, often shunned in the United States, even by those whose banner he carries the highest.

Lilienthal says some people kid him as being the "Man from LaMancha." And true to the characterization, he frequently brings audiences to their feet by quoting from the song which had Quixote "reaching for the unreachable stars."

Click here to hear part of the lyrics:
http://www.rykodisc.com/RykoInternal/DatabaseSupport/RealAudio/800_9.ram

This Home Page has been authorized by
Alfred M. Lilienthal
and comments will be passed on to him personally.

E-mail Webmaster
at this link now

Jews called in Christ

CLICK ON LINK

Pages

My Blog List

Jesus Christ the Saviour

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless | Jews for Justice for Palestinians

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Alfred M. Lilienthal

The Coming of the Antichrist

The Catholic Creed

Parousia of Our Lord Jesus Christ

Justice of God

Traditional Catholic Prayers

Leila Hussein

Look up, your redemption is at hand

Palestine Cry

Palestine Cry

Palestine Cry

Communist World Government

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him

Miko's Blog

Iraq Cry

Syria

The Final Trial

Apostasy

The Illuminati

Good versus evil

Good versus evil

Pashtun Resist

Jews called in Christ

Ishtar Rising...

Culture