Pages

My Blog List

Jesus Christ the Saviour

The true God who is the eternal I AM prophesied through His servants the prophets of the coming of the Messiah, who is the only Saviour of the world. The form of salvation, His Cross, is shown by Isaiah 52- 53, see here: Jews called in Christ: St. Isaiah and the time of His appearing and His sacrifice on His Most Holy Cross for our salvation is told in Daniel 9 in St. Daniel’s 70 weeks of years prophecy.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

The Justice of God: Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord: The BROAD way to hell - forever.

The Justice of God: Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord: The BROAD way to hell - forever.


John 14:6 Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me. 


Matthew 28:19
Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.



Baptism (14)





















 Matthew 1:17 So all the generations, from Abraham to David, are fourteen generations. And from David to the transmigration of Babylon, are fourteen generations: and from the transmigration of Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.

 Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat. 


THE PROMISED LAND - CANAAN, THE HOLY LAND OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF GOD

The Promised Land - Canaan, the Holy Land of Our Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God 
click on picture - scroll through all articles



_鬼: HINDU BUDDHIST – TOTAL SATANISM

_鬼: Hindu Buddhist – total Satanism 
click on picture


ECUMENISM WHICH IS IDOLATRY

Ecumenism which is Idolatry
click on picture





Parousia of Jesus Christ Our Lord: The BROAD way to hell - forever.


Isis, the ancient summation and source of all the mother of harlots and Summerian-Assyro/Babylonian-Indian Buddhas and Bodhisattvas and demons and gods and goddesses. All of which are poured down upon humanity through the demon gate of Buddhism (between Jupiter [Zeus] and Saturn [Satan] in the Solar System) and have their original source in the ancient Summerian primeval sea of Nammu ('Nammu' is the first part of the black magic invocation of the demons and devils behind the idols throughout the Far East, especially in the opening of the demon eye ceremonies).
Isis and Horus as Mary and Christ in the Merovingian Gnostic heresy.


Rv:16:
13 And I saw from the mouth of the dragon and from the mouth of the beast and from the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs.
14 For they are the spirits of devils, working signs: and they go forth unto the kings of the whole earth, to gather them to battle against the great day of the Almighty God.
15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
16 And he shall gather them together into a place which in Hebrew is called Armagedon.
(DRV)

Tyche was the goddess which was the summation, in the Graeco-Egyptian religion of the Graeco-Roman world, of all goddesses and therefore the beginning and end of all the poytheistic gods and goddesses of the ancient mediterranean world. The Cumaean, Tiburtine and Delphic sibyls were the principal fortune tellers of the Roman empire which would convince the citizens of the empire of the will of Rome (the beast from the sea). The beast from the earth was the false prophet i.e. sorcerers and magicians and Caesar himself as pontifex maximus of the Roman religion. The three spirits out of the mouth of the dragon and the beast and the false prophet are the three sibyls above.

Rv:16:
17 ¶ And the seventh angel poured out his vial upon the air. And there came a great voice out of the temple from the throne, saying: It is done.
18 And there were lightnings and voices and thunders: and there was a great earthquake, such an one as never had been since men were upon the earth, such an earthquake, so great.
19 And the great city was divided into three parts: and the cities of the Gentiles fell. And great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give her the cup of the wine of the indignation of his wrath.
20 And every island fled away: and the mountains were not found.
21 And great hail, like a talent, came down from heaven upon men: and men blasphemed God, for the plague of the hail: because it was exceeding great.
(DRV)
The precursor in Egypt, of Tyche as mother goddess summation of all the gods/goddesses, is the triple goddess Isis represented and invocated as Selene-Mene-Hecate. This is the absolute worst of the virgin goddess of black magic/sorcery in the history of the world. The representation is Isis as sorceress in her lunar and chthonic form united to the sky above and ruler of earth in between standing on the globe of the world around which a serpent is coiled. One statue still extant today of Isis as this sorceress is the Farnese Isis (Naples Museum). She holds the Intaglio (magic ring of the serpent uroboros, the serpent that eats it own tail). The formula of consecration is invoked by the power of the serpent with the crescent moon with two stars one on each end of the horns of the crescent moon forming the tang of the sorcerer/sorceress with the sun of Abraxas, the ancient god of all sorcery and black magic surmounted above that. Any resemblance to the false representation of Mary as the Immaculate Conception especially as shown on the so-called "Miraculous Medal" standing on the globe of the earth is NOT ACCIDENTAL.
In the fifth/sixth century A.D. the Syrian writings of Pseudo-Dionysios first appeared and were later added to. In this the ancient pagan idea of synthesizing, that is combining all the ancient gods/goddesses, an idea going back to the Graeco-Egyptian Hermes Trimegistus (Apollyon appearing as Hermes thrice blessed - a pagan false trinity), was put forth in gnostic psuedo christian dress. Included was Mary as the summation of all that is divine, i. e. the mother triple goddess. Sergei Bulgakov was condemned by his own church, the Russian Orthodox Church, as a heretic, in the first part of the 20th century for this same thing, in which Bulgakov attempted to make Mary the Hupostasis of God and the divinity by which each of the Three Persons of the Most Holy Trinity of the True God is approached and in no other way. In short, it is a sophism to make her the triple goddess and replace the worship of the True Trinity with polytheistic/pantheism. This worship of Satan in place of the True God, the Most Holy Trinity will only bring utter destruction upon the earth.
In the summation of all Heresies and Apostasies and Blaspheming of the Holy Spirit known as Vatican II, Bulgakov's blasphemous system was inculcated by name and in this same false teaching of Bulgakov to make the Antitheotokos the virgin goddess of black magic to support all of the false apparitions (heretofor condemned), supposedly of Mary, and make these apparitions accepted and thereby bring in KNOWINGLY the Gnostic evolutionary Monism - Pantheism of this "ecumenical council of thieves".


For instance the Gnostics, according to the Church Fathers, basing themselves on the Naasseni (the apostate Jewish serpent worshipping Satanist priesthood cult which is the base for all Kabalah and the Zohar) copied much of their doctrine from Platonism, Graeco-Egyptian paganism and far eastern religiosity and claimed, totally falsely, that this is what Jesus taught. It is not at all what Jesus taught nor at all what Moses taught. The Gnostic doctrines are obvious in this plagiarizing of paganism and denial of the true Jesus Christ. In the East the Buddhist teaching of how Sakyamuni (Gotama), the Buddha, obtained his “enlightenment” is obviously diabolic and has a great deal in common with Graeco-Egyptian mysticism in the west; especially this is extremely similar to Simon Magus’ portrayal of himself entwined with snakes in the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil as a man-god to be sought after as the ultimate teacher of true knowledge. The prime example: The Dragon Flower Tree (the banyan or pipal [fig] tree) from which the great white serpent from the abyss (the devil) granted Gotama (the Buddha) his “enlightenment” which consisted of his denying the I AM and being his own saviour. Otherwise known as the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil which in classical and traditional Catholic teaching is the first type of the devil. Gn:2:17: 17 But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat. For in what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death. (DRV)


Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless | Jews for Justice for Palestinians

The true God who is the eternal I AM prophesied through His servants the prophets of the coming of the Messiah, who is the only Saviour of the world. The form of salvation, His Cross, is shown by Isaiah 52- 53, see here: Jews called in Christ: St. Isaiah and the time of His appearing and His sacrifice on His Most Holy Cross for our salvation is told in Daniel 9 in St. Daniel’s 70 weeks of years prophecy.

For all Jews wishing to convert sincerely from the heart to Jesus Christ now, here is a prayer based on the biblical Hebrew of the prophets of the Old Testament and the Septuagint Greek of the Old Testament and the New Testament and Arabic.
(The Arabic, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, means the same as God Almighty, or 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator, in Septuagint Greek.)

In the below “Dam (Blood) Kadosh (Holy) bet Yeshua ha Maschiach (Jesus Christ) kanawn anawim (have mercy on Your faithful [those who turn to God by the shed Blood of Christ on Calvary])” is asking for God's forgiveness by the shed Holy Blood of Christ – which is the only forgiveness there is from God for sin.

Shalom Aleichem bet Baruch Adonai Yahweh Eloheiunu Yahweh echad dérekh ben Yahweh bar Elohim Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach b'tókh Ruach Elohim Yahweh Adonai

Adonai Yahweh El Olam kanawn anawim
Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Adonai Ruach Elohim Yahweh kanawn anawim

Adonai Yahweh Eloheiunu Yahweh echad kanawn anawim
Adonai Yahweh Elohim Kadosh kanawn anawim

Adonai Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim

Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim
Dam Kadosh bet Yeshua ha Maschiach kanawn anawim

'Agious 'Agious 'Agious Kurios 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator Elieson
Kyrie Elieson
Christie Elieson
Kyrie Elieson
'Agious 'Agious 'Agious Kurios 'O Theos 'O Pantocrator, Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala, Elieson
Baruch Adonai Yahweh Eloheuinu Yahweh echad Elohiko Hashamaim
Most blessed Lord Yahweh God-plural personhood Yahweh composite-Unity God higher than the highest heaven
Shamaim Hashamaim Eloueth Ahiyah asher Ahiyah
higher than the highest heaven God I am (Yah) that I am (Yah)
El Olam Yahweh El Elyown Yahweh Elohim eth Yaoth Elohim Qadosh
God eternal Yahweh Most High Yahweh God you Yah who drives the evil powers to flight Holy God
Eloah Israel El Shaddai
God of Israel God Almighty
Moshawah
Our Saviour
Adonai Eloah Melek Eloah miqqadash
Lord God King God our Sanctifier
El Israel Anawim
God of Israel Your faithful
El Elohim Yahweh El Olam eth Abba Our Father of Lights Holy with
God of Gods (most high) Yahweh God eternal you
Whom there is no variation or shadow of turning
ben Yahweh bar Elohim
Son of Yahweh Son of God
Yahweh Shamah Emmanuel Yeshua ha Maschiach Jesus Christ Our only Lord
Yahweh Christ perfect servant of hearing God God with us Jesus the Messiah
and Saviour
Ruach Yahweh Chokmah Abiyr Gebuwrah Neshamah Yahweh
Spirit of Yahweh Wisdom Might Power Spirit-Breath of Yahweh
Holy Spirit Life Quickening Breath of Life Energy our
Paraclete
Ruach Elohim Olam Yahweh Borea Emeth Huy Eloah Chay Melek Olam Eloah
Spirit of God eternal Yahweh Creator True Living God and King Immortal God of Hosts
Sabaoth Holy Trinity Adorable Unity
Eloah Anawim with and
God of the faithful
by the prayer and company of all Your
Elect Doxas and Anawim for and with us unceasingly kanawn Anawim
have mercy on Your faithful
Our Only
KANNAW
Our Only
Holy Lord God Who Created and Redeemed us
TSIDKENOU
Our Only Righteousness
YIREH
Our Only Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world
NISSI
Our Only Sacrifice
MELCHISEDECH
Our Only Priest King
MELEK
Our Only Sovereign King of kings and Lord of lords
SHALOM
Our Only Peace from above
KOHANE
Our Only High Priest
ROHI
Our Only Good Shepherd and Overseer of our souls
ROPHE
Our Only Healer and Miracle Worker
MIQQADOSH
Our Only Sanctifier
+


HOLY HOLY HOLY LORD GOD PANTOCRATOR
Who is and was and is to come
Unceasingly
to Whom be all the
LOVE
ADORATION
AUTHORITY
GLORY
HONOR
OBEDIENCE
THANKSGIVING
POWER
DIVINITY
RICHES
WISDOM
STRENGTH
BLESSING
DOMINION
SALVATION
PRAISE
WORSHIP
SERVICE
DEEDS
INNOCENCE
FAITH
PREACHINGS
PROPHECIES
PRAYERS
EXALTATION
THANKSGIVING
WE LOVE YOU FOR YOU FIRST LOVED US
WITH ALL THANKSGIVING
With and by the prayer and company of all Your elect angels and saints, for and with us unceasingly,
especially Your holy
SERAFIM
CHERUBIM
KURIOTETES
ARCHES
especially
St. Michael
St. Gabriel holy Archangelos
EXOUSIAS
DUNAMEIS
ANGELOS
Grant us Your gifts and mercies, especially Your Holy
CHOKMAH WISDOM FIRE OF LOVE OF WISDOM YOURSELF HOLY LIFE
BIYNAH UNDERSTANDING WISDOM OF SUPERNATURAL KNOWLEDGE PROPHECY AND MIRACLES
ETSAH COUNSEL MIGHT OF SANCTIFYING LOVE IN FAITH

GEBUWRAH POWER STRENGTH HEALINGS MIRACLES
DAATH KNOWLEDGE TO KNOW ONLY THE GOOD DISCERNMENT OF SPIRITS AUTHORITY AND STRENGTH REPELLING ALL EVIL SPIRITS INVISIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM US UNCEASINGLY
YIRAH GODLINESS ENERGY OF MIRACLES IN THE UNITY OF GOD TONGUES AND TRANSLATION
AHABAH AGAPE PHILADELPHIA LOVE SPIRIT OF THE GOSPEL THE LOVE OF GOD JESUS CHRIST OUR ONLY LORD AND SAVIOUR


See this: Palestine Cry


Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless | Jews for Justice for Palestinians


Begun in 2002, judged illegal 2004, Israel’s apartheid wall goes on regardless


Photo by S’ra DeSantis, from Vermonters for a Just Peace
European campaign against Israel’s apartheid wall launched in the Hague
#10Years2Long
By Palestine Information Centre
July 02, 2012
THE HAGUE– The Hague-based European initiative against the wall and settlements launched on Sunday an information campaign against Israel’s segregation wall and settlement expansion in the West Bank.
“No to the wall … no to settlements” is the slogan for its campaign that includes sit-ins, protests, symposiums and social networking.
Head of the European initiative Amin Abu Rashed said in a press release that the campaign was launched on the eighth anniversary of the resolution against the segregation wall that was issued by the international court of justice in 2004.
Abu Rashid added that the campaign is aimed at renewing international moves to condemn Israel’s settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian lands.
He noted that the campaign started on Sunday and would end on July 9, the same day the international court of justice issued its resolution against the wall.
The anti-wall activist affirmed that the campaign would include meetings with officials from international legal and humanitarian organizations and the UN to hand them a research study about the adverse impacts of the wall on the lives of Palestinians in the occupied territories during the past eight years.
A number of symposiums about the Israeli apartheid wall and settlement activities will be organized in a number of Arab and foreign countries, he added.
He stressed that the European initiative would be working keenly during its campaign on delivering a message to the international court of justice emphasizing the need for forming an executive body able to enforce its resolution against the wall.
The European initiative against the wall and settlements is headquartered in the Hague, Netherlands, and was established on the first of June 2010. It is a consortium of many European groups and human rights organizations which oppose Israel’s apartheid wall and settlement activities in the Palestinian lands.

ADVISORY OPINION
The Court finds that the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and its associated régime are contrary to international law; it states the legal consequences arising from that illegality
International Court of Justice, Press Release
July 9, 2004
THE HAGUE, 9 July 2004. The International Court of Justice (ICJ), principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has today rendered its Advisory Opinion in the case concerning the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (request for advisory opinion).
In its Opinion, the Court finds unanimously that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by the United Nations General Assembly and decides by fourteen votes to one to comply with that request.
The Court responds to the question as follows:
- “A. By fourteen votes to one,
The construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated régime, are contrary to international law”;
- “B. By fourteen votes to one,
Israel is under an obligation to terminate its breaches of international law; it is under an obligation to cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, to dismantle forthwith the structure therein situated, and to repeal or render ineffective forthwith all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, in accordance with paragraph 151 of this Opinion”;
- “C. By fourteen votes to one,
Israel is under an obligation to make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem”;
- “D. By thirteen votes to two,
All States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction; all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 have in addition the obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention”;
- “E. By fourteen votes to one,
The United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and the associated régime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.”
Reasoning of the Court
The Advisory Opinion is divided into three parts: jurisdiction and judicial propriety; legality of the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; legal consequences of the breaches found.
Jurisdiction of the Court and judicial propriety
The Court states that when it is seised of a request for an advisory opinion, it must first consider whether it has jurisdiction to give that opinion. It finds that the General Assembly, which requested the opinion by resolution ES‑10/14 of 8 December 2003, is authorized to do so by Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter.
The Court, as it has sometimes done in the past, then gives certain indications as to the relationship between the question on which the advisory opinion is requested and the activities of the General Assembly. It finds that the General Assembly, in requesting an advisory opinion from the Court, did not exceed its competence, as qualified by Article 12, paragraph 1, of the Charter, which provides that, while the Security Council is exercising its functions in respect of any dispute or situation, the Assembly must not make any recommendation with regard thereto unless the Security Council so requests.
The Court further refers to the fact that the General Assembly adopted resolution ES‑10/14 during its Tenth Emergency Special Session, convened pursuant to resolution 377A (V), which provides that if the Security Council fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, the General Assembly may consider the matter immediately with a view to making recommendations to Member States. The Court finds that the conditions laid down by that resolution were met when the Tenth Emergency Special Session was convened; that was in particular true when the General Assembly decided to request an opinion, as the Security Council was at that time unable to adopt a resolution concerning the construction of the wall as a result of the negative vote of a permanent member.
The Court then rejects the argument that an opinion could not be given in the present case on the ground that the question posed in the request is not a legal one.
Having established its jurisdiction, the Court considers the propriety of giving the requested opinion. It recalls that the lack of consent by a State to its contentious jurisdiction has no bearing on its jurisdiction to give an advisory opinion. It adds that the giving of an opinion would not have the effect, in the present case, of circumventing the principle of consent to judicial settlement, given that the question on which the General Assembly requested an opinion is located in a much broader frame of reference than that of the bilateral dispute between Israel and Palestine, and that it is of direct concern to the United Nations. Nor does the Court accept the contention that it should decline to give the advisory opinion requested because its opinion could impede a political, negotiated solution to the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict. It further finds it has before it sufficient information and evidence to enable it to give its opinion, and emphasizes that it is for the General Assembly to assess the usefulness of that opinion. The Court concludes from the foregoing that there is no compelling reason precluding it from giving the requested opinion.

Legality of the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

Before addressing the legal consequences of the construction of the wall (the term which the General Assembly has chosen to use and which is also used in the Opinion, since the other expressions sometimes employed are no more accurate if understood in the physical sense), the Court considers whether or not the construction of the wall is contrary to international law.
The Court determines the rules and principles of international law which are relevant to the question posed by the General Assembly. The Court begins by citing, with reference to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and to General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV), the principles of the prohibition of the threat or use of force and the illegality of any territorial acquisition by such means, as reflected in customary international law. It further cites the principle of self‑determination of peoples, as enshrined in the Charter and reaffirmed by resolution 2625 (XXV). As regards international humanitarian law, the Court refers to the provisions of the Hague Regulation of 1907, which have become part of customary law, as well as the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949, applicable in those Palestinian territories which before the armed conflict of 1967 lay to the east of the 1949 Armistice demarcation line (or “Green Line”) and were occupied by Israel during that conflict. The Court further notes that certain human rights instruments (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child) are applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
The Court ascertains whether the construction of the wall has violated the above‑mentioned rules and principles. It first observes that the route of the wall as fixed by the Israeli Government includes within the “Closed Area” (between the wall and the “Green Line”) some 80 percent of the settlers living in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Recalling that the Security Council described Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in that territory as a “flagrant violation” of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the Court finds that those settlements have been established in breach of international law. It further considers certain fears expressed to it that the route of the wall will prejudge the future frontier between Israel and Palestine; it considers that the construction of the wall and its associated régime “create a ‘fait accompli’ on the ground that could well become permanent, in which case, . . . [the construction of the wall] would be tantamount to de facto annexation”. The Court notes that the route chosen for the wall gives expression in loco to the illegal measures taken by Israel, and deplored by the Security Council, with regard to Jerusalem and the settlements, and that it entails further alterations to the demographic composition of the Occupied Palestinian Territory. It finds that the “construction [of the wall], along with measures taken previously, . . . severely impedes the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self‑determination, and is therefore a breach of Israel’s obligation to respect that right”.
The Court then considers the information furnished to it regarding the impact of the construction of the wall on the daily life of the inhabitants of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (destruction or requisition of private property, restrictions on freedom of movement, confiscation of agricultural land, cutting‑off of access to primary water sources, etc.). It finds that the construction of the wall and its associated régime are contrary to the relevant provisions of the Hague Regulations of 1907 and of the Fourth Geneva Convention; that they impede the liberty of movement of the inhabitants of the territory as guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; and that they also impede the exercise by the persons concerned of the right to work, to health, to education and to an adequate standard of living as proclaimed in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Lastly, the Court finds that this construction and its associated régime, coupled with the establishment of settlements, are tending to alter the demographic composition of the Occupied Palestinian Territory and thereby contravene the Fourth Geneva Convention and the relevant Security Council resolutions.
The Court observes that certain humanitarian law and human rights instruments include qualifying clauses or provisions for derogation which may be invoked by States parties, inter alia where military exigencies or the needs of national security or public order so require. It states that it is not convinced that the specific course Israel has chosen for the wall was necessary to attain its security objectives and, holding that none of such clauses are applicable, finds that the construction of the wall constitutes “breaches by Israel of various of its obligations under the applicable international humanitarian law and human rights instruments”.
In conclusion, the Court considers that Israel cannot rely on a right of self‑defence or on a state of necessity in order to preclude the wrongfulness of the construction of the wall. The Court accordingly finds that the construction of the wall and its associated régime are contrary to international law.

Legal consequences of the violations found

The Court draws a distinction between the legal consequences of these violations for Israel and those for other States.
In regard to the former, the Court finds that Israel must respect the right of the Palestinian people to self‑determination and its obligations under humanitarian law and human rights law. Israel must also put an end to the violation of its international obligations flowing from the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and must accordingly cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall, dismantle forthwith those parts of that structure situated within the Occupied Palestinian Territory and forthwith repeal or render ineffective all legislative and regulatory acts adopted with a view to construction of the wall and establishment of its associated régime, except in so far as such acts may continue to be relevant for compliance by Israel with its obligations in regard to reparation. Israel must further make reparation for all damage suffered by all natural or legal persons affected by the wall’s construction.
As regards the legal consequences for other States, the Court finds that all States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction. The Court further finds that it is for all States, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to see to it that any impediment, resulting from the construction of the wall, in the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self‑determination is brought to an end. In addition, all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention are under an obligation, while respecting the Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention.
Finally, the Court is of the view that the United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and its associated régime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.
The Court concludes by stating that the construction of the wall must be placed in a more general context. In this regard, the Court notes that Israel and Palestine are “under an obligation scrupulously to observe the rules of international humanitarian law”. In the Court’s view, the tragic situation in the region can be brought to an end only through implementation in good faith of all relevant Security Council resolutions. The Court further draws the attention of the General Assembly to the “need for . . . efforts to be encouraged with a view to achieving as soon as possible, on the basis of international law, a negotiated solution to the outstanding problems and the establishment of a Palestinian State, existing side by side with Israel and its other neighbours, with peace and security for all in the region”.
Composition of the Court
The Court was composed as follows: Judge Shi, President; Judge Ranjeva, Vice‑President; Judges Guillaume, Koroma, Vereshchetin, Higgins, Parra‑Aranguren, Kooijmans, Rezek, Al‑Khasawneh, Buergenthal, Elaraby, Owada, Simma and Tomka; Registrar Couvreur.
Judges Koroma, Higgins, Kooijmans and Al‑Khasawneh append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion. Judge Buergenthal appends a declaration. Judges Elaraby and Owada append separate opinions.
__________
A summary of the Advisory Opinion is published in the document entitled “Summary No. 2004/2”, to which summaries of the declaration and separate opinions appended to the Advisory Opinion are attached. This Press Communiqué, the summary of the Advisory Opinion and the latter’s full text can also be accessed on the Court’s website by clicking on “Docket” and “Decisions” (www.icj-cij.org).

Thursday, May 3, 2012

The I AM in the Old and New Testaments and the seven names of God in the Old Testament

The seven names of God in the Old Testament – all other names therein are variations for the most part.

In addition the Holy Spirit is named. In Hebrew the Holy Spirit is Ruach or Ruach Elohim (the Holy Spirit of the Triune God).

Jesus Christ, the Son of God and His leading the Patriarchs and Israel is shown in the Old Testament. And Jesus is named in Greek in the Septuagint prophetically.

One example: Hb:3:18 But I will rejoice in the Lord: and I will joy in God my Jesus. (DRV)

The Seven Names of God {Reference source: The Catholic Dictionary 1950} ADONAI YAHWEH ELOHIM EL SHADDAI ELYOWN QADOSH which can be translated in order directly and it is correct. It translates, literally as: Lord Yahweh (I Am) God (Majestic plural "We" as in French where it is literally plural, i.e. the Trinity) God Mighty (as in Almighty) Most High Holy (as in All Holy, the Holy one, not meaning plainly absolutely singular but the One who is Holy). Therefore: Lord Yahweh Triune God, God Mighty, Most High, Holy. ADONAI = Lord, YAHWEH = I Am - meaning the only One and True God who has Aseity which is self existence, ELOHIM = God Trinity, EL = God, SHADDAI = Mighty, ELYOWN = Most High, QADOSH = Holy

Dt:6:4:4 Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord. (DRV) In Hebrew, that is: Shemah Y’srael Yahweh Eloheinu Yahweh echad. This English translation is as deficient as most are. Not on purpose, because translation is many times very difficult. The Hebrew text is taken to be the Masoretic by most translators (which is not what St. Jerome worked from) and therefore Yahweh is rendered Adonai which is Lord in English. Concerning the Most Holy Trinity, one name of God here and it’s modifier are important. Eloheinu is a form of Elohim and both are plural. El in the above seven names of God is singular and in the Old Testament almost always refers to God the Father. Echad is plural but in a sense of unity of the plurality concerning Eloheinu – Who is Yahweh, which is the most sacred name of God in the Old Testament Hebrew. The Jew, Maimonides, the Anti-Christian Talmudist, in the later Middle Ages attempted to make God in the Shemah singular by lying and substituting iahid (which is absolutely singular) for echad. St. Jerome’s vulgate renders the Shemah as “audi Israhel Dominus Deum noster Dominus unus est” simply because Latin has no equivalent for echad. Hence St. Jerome used ‘unus.’ Moses certainly did know that God is Triune. In the above seven names of God, Adonai or Lord refers to any one of the Holy Trinity. Yahweh is the actual name of God in His very nature which is His essence or substance. Essence is houmoosia in Greek and substance is substantia in Latin. Yahweh therefore is the name equally of all three persons of the Holy Trinity. Elohim is the Trinity. El is God the Father and Shaddai (almighty power of God) is the Almighty Son who is the only Mediator between God and men and Qadosh or Holy One, as it is usually rendered, can refer to the Holy Spirit and most especially does in Miqqadosh meaning literally Sanctifier. Hence the Shemah is Moses confession given him by God of the Triune three persons of the Godhead.

A further extension of Yahweh’s name given Moses is Ahiyah asher Ahiyah where Yah is directly Yahweh. In this name the very nature of God is Yah of Yah so that Christ only – begotten of the Father before all time and creation is meant. Also, the Church Fathers tell us that Yeshua is Hebrew for Jesus, especially in St. Matthew’s Gospel in it’s original Hebrew. Yeshua is exactly from Yahweh in a form that indicates that Yeshua is of the nature of Yahweh (in this case God the Father – El) and is furthermore distinct in a sense, in other words, God the Son. This is the verse it occurs in. Ex:3:14:14 God said to Moses: I AM WHO AM. He said: Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel: HE WHO IS, hath sent me to you. (DRV) This is the verse that the Jews call the tetragrammaton, but in fact, it is the most explicit Old Testament reference to the eternal begetting from the Father of the Son. That is, the Son of God Who will be sent for the salvation of those who believe in Him. It was Christ pre-incarnate on the mount that gave Moses the law and Who during Moses’ sojourn with Him gave Moses the prophecies of His own future Incarnation. Another such prophecy of Christ’s future incarnation is the following: Dt:18:15:15 The Lord thy God will raise up to thee a PROPHET of thy nation and of thy brethren like unto me: him thou shalt hear: (DRV) These are in the Old Testament. Two of the New Testament references to the same meanings are the below: Jn:8:58:58 Jesus said to them: Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham was made, I AM. (DRV) St. Paul referring to the Exodus: 1Cor:10:4:4 And all drank the same spiritual drink: (And they drank of the spiritual rock that followed them: and the rock was Christ.) (DRV)

Especially regarding the importance of the New Testament verse Jn:8:58:58 Jesus said to them: Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham was made, I AM. We must absolutely take note of the fact that Christ here professes Himself as pre-existent, which only God can be by His nature pre-existent. Patristically, the Greek here is most important and very exact, "I AM" is in the Greek, "egoo eimi." It is linguistically, and especially in terms of the Septuagint-Koine Greek it philologically extends from, "o oon" which exactly sums up the core meaning of Homoousion from Houmoosia, which is extended exactly from "o oon." (Homo = same and ousion from ousia from oon meaning essence, which the Church Fathers used creedally from this exact verse to exegete the Most Holy Trinity; with "Yahweh" which is "egoo eimi" i.e. "o oon" which is "I AM" as the core essential BEING of GOD self existent and Immortal, having always existed and always existing forever, which nature is shared equally by all three Persons of the Most Holy Trinity - i.e. all three having the same essence.)




Rev. 1:4 – 6 John to the seven churches which are in Asia. Grace be unto you and peace, from him that is and that was and that is to come: and from the seven spirits which are before his throne:
And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the first begotten of the dead and the prince of the kings of the earth, who hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood (when He became Incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the blessed virgin Mary and went to the Cross for our salvation)
And hath made us a kingdom, and priests to God and his Father. To him be glory and empire for ever and ever. Amen.(DRV)

Rev.:21:6:
6 And he said to me: It is done. I am Alpha and Omega: the Beginning and the End. To him that thirsteth, I will give of the fountain of the water of life, freely. (DRV)
These two phrases that is and that was and that is to come (Greek “‘o oon kai ‘o en kai ‘o erchoumenos”) and I am Alpha and Omega (Greek: “egoo eimi to Alpha kai to Omega”) are emphatic declarations of Christ’s Divinity and Immortality for it is the Thrice Holy Trinity – Rv:4:8 And the four living creatures had each of them six wings: and round about and within they are full of eyes. And they rested not day and night, saying: Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty, who was and who is and who is to come. (Greek “‘agious ‘agious ‘agious kurios ‘o theos ‘o pantocrator”) – alone Who possesses Aseity (self existence and Who is therefore alone uncreated) and Who is Immortal of the same Essence/Substance – Nature.

In the above: the “who [that] is”, in Greek “‘o oon”, is the declaration of Aseity. The “who [that] was” and the “who [that] is to come” with the “‘o oon”, self existence, is the declaration of Immortality (having no beginning and no end – always existing). The phrase I am Alpha and Omega has exactly the same meaning. “I am” – “egoo eimi” is the equivalent of Yahweh (God’s proper name) in Hebrew meaning “I am” in the same sense as the above “‘o oon”. Alpha and Omega has the same meaning as Immortality in the above. Pantocrator (translated as Almighty) is the declaration of the Thrice Holy Lord God’s All ruling absolute Sovereignty and includes emphatically the meaning that He is alone uncreated and Creator, ex nihilo, of all of creation. This relates directly to the beginning of the Gospel of St. John and the beginning of the first book of the Torah (the Pentateuch) which is Genesis. See: Genesis 1:1 through 2:4 and St. John’s Gospel 1:1 through vs. 18. All of this and the exact seventy human generations recounted in St. Luke’s Gospel 3:1 – 38 from Adam to Christ (see also the parallel in St. Matthew’s Gospel 1:1 – 25 from Abraham to Christ) and the testimony of the Church Fathers does not allow any pagan evolutionary gods nor even sophist pantheistic idolatrous creationism but only creation by the Creator as He said He did it, and only Redemption in God and His Christ (the Messiah, al-Maseeh) as He said that it is; the false gods or pagan idolatrous religions that willfully reject God and Jesus Christ (those who do not willfully reject Him but seek God in their hearts are judged by God alone) are without grace and they and their followers will be damned forever, who do not repent in this life from those false gods and religions and come to God and His Christ and make confession in Him and be baptized by God’s Spirit {believers in monotheistic Islam and all men of good will (in the full consensus of the Church Fathers) are included as true believers in the true God and therefore saved by their confession of belief in and fulfilling the will of God, Allah (SWT)}. Allah is from biblical Hebrew ‘Eloah’ and means the true God, All middle Eastern Christians, including Catholics, who are Arabic speakers call on Allah as the name of the true God. Amen.